Wednesday, June 28, 2006

Feminism, a lost cause, full of holes?


You once had the pleasure of dating a devout feminist, you say pleasure but really you mean misfortune. You had no idea she was a feminist when you started going out and if you had, you stil lwould have gone for her, you just love a woman that can hold her own in a battle of wits. You learnt alot from her and when the relationship ended, it ended by mutual and amicable consent, except for a few broken plates and a torn football poster.

Some feminists claim to want equality, they want women to be equal to men, they want to be on the same foothold, they want to have the same authority, however some draw the line at responsibility. Some say there is no place for men in this world, but they overlook the fact that if it weren't for a man having sex with their mothers they wouldn't be able to voice this misguided opinion. Personally you think being a feminist can sometimes be an outlet because these women can't get laid.

However, there are some women who may turn to this misguided supremecy seeking cause, because they have been hurt, either violently or emotionally, by men in the past. These humans don't deserve to be called 'men', if a member of the male species disrespects a woman, he deserves to have his private parts cut off and displayed in a jar, or something worse like a key being scratched down his Car.

Feminism, as you see it, has been brought into the lime light by the ongoing problem of prize money at The Wimbledon Tennis Championships, this is that the women want an equal share of the prize money, they want to receive the same winnings as men. Now you agree with this, they should be entitled to the same amount of prize money as men, there is no question about it. However, this should only be the case if they play the same amount of time as men. At the moment, Men Singles at Wimbledon are best of five sets, women's singles are best of three, if they want to have the same prize money they should put in the same amount of work? Agreed?

You see a solution to this situation, the whole aspect of feminism should be disbanded. Call these women chauvinistic cows instead. After all, men who behave in the same way are called male chauvinistic pigs, it's only fair that the buck goes both ways. Some men will allways see women as the 'fairer sex', and to be quite honest you know that many women fit into this catagory. However their are some women who clearly don't, all a person has to do is spend a few nights watching CCTV footage of female fights, fuelled by drink or drugs or whatever the latest craze is.

When all is said and done, every person is unique, every one has their own view, their own take on life and their own way of living and doing. Who are we to ever make an assumption or to judge a person for the worse based on a look or a voice? Take a person as they are found, don't stereotype on gender, sexuality, race or hair colour, when this 'stereotyping' stops, society will be a far better place.

Who needs a two day force policy diversity course, hey?

7 Comments:

At 11:13 PM, Blogger ExtraSpecialCopper said...

Sort of related . . . . some men are gits to women. I recently went to a domestic with a very good collegue of mine (we get on like a house on fire) Anyway, this woman at the domestic literally backed away when she saw me, and everytime I spoke to her, and the same when other blokes walked past. She had been subject of domestic violence by her husband and the actions of this fool (the bloke) has caused this woman to not trust, and to be fearful of blokes! Not on is it. I am just thanfull to my collegue who did an absolutely fantastic job dealing with her

 
At 6:04 PM, Blogger fjl said...

You say that Joe but men always believe other men over women. For instance, you haven't visited my blog for ages.

Hey?

 
At 6:12 PM, Blogger fjl said...

And, when two wome argue, men dismiss them both.

As if their arguments were full of holes?

There you can discuss that one in your course training.

 
At 7:31 PM, Blogger Joe90 said...

I always listen to women, I find they usually talk more sense than men. Most women think with their minds, alot of men only think with their trousers.

 
At 8:28 PM, Blogger fjl said...

Funny guy x

I had this instinct about you. I may be wrong, but I'm not usually. I believe you must be something of a believer, a man who truly believes in his job, unlike the cynics. Hence, your love of women, who you naturally love and defend.

Very revealing :-)

 
At 1:48 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The prize money argument they're having is crap. Women play 3 sets, men play 5. Men's tennis generates more cash. It is only fair they get a prize in line with the fact they play more games and earn more money for the club.

Feminism is also rubbish. It takes no account of the fact that because men and women are different they may have different priorities. They are whinging again on the news about "too many women in jobs that are below their skills working part time". Err, maybe that's because they want to spend time with their children?! Except the militant feminists don't understand this and think womens priorities should be more like mens. Madness. Utter madness. The rot started in the 1960s.

 
At 2:57 PM, Anonymous WebWatcher! said...

If you knew anything about Wimbledon other than the appearance of the female players, you would be aware that they have asked again (and again) for the ruling body to allow women to play the same number of matches as men, this request has been repeatedly denied.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home